Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 18-20, 2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-345039

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To report clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy in 120 patients, focusing on its technique and indications.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and twenty patients received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy from May 2001 to April 2004, including 75 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), 42 percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), 2 percutaneous endoscopic duodenostomy (PED), 1 direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ). All tubes established by traditional pull technique.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The average duration of PEG was (9 +/- 4) min, PEJ (17 +/- 6) min, DPEJ 20 min, and PED was 10 and 12 min for 2 patients, respectively. Success rate of the technique was 98.4% (120/122). Major complication rate was 0.8% (1/120), and minor complication rate was 7.5% (9/120). Clinical indications: PEG, PED and PEJ were applied for long-term enteral nutritional support in 88 patients, gastrointestinal decompression in 25 patients, and transfusing external drainage bile to gastrointestinal tract in 5 patients. Two radiation enteritis patients used PEG for gastrointestinal decompression preoperatively and long-term enteral nutritional support postoperatively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>PEG, PED PEJ and DPEJ are easily handled, effective and safe, and may be widely used in clinical practice.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Duodenostomy , Methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Enteral Nutrition , Gastrostomy , Methods , Jejunostomy , Methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL